The annexation of Hawaii by the United States in 1898 was a complex event that sparked differing opinions among the Hawaiian population. While a significant portion of Native Hawaiians opposed the annexation and fought to preserve their sovereignty, there were also Hawaiians who supported the move. Their support was shaped by economic interests, political strategy, cultural influences, and the hope for stability in a rapidly changing world. To understand how Hawaiians supported annexation, it’s essential to explore the motivations, groups involved, and historical context that led to such support despite widespread resistance.
Historical Background of Hawaiian Annexation
From Monarchy to Provisional Government
Hawaii was a sovereign kingdom until the late 19th century, ruled by native monarchs. However, by the 1890s, growing influence from American business interests, particularly sugar plantation owners, began to shape the islands’ politics. In 1893, Queen LiliÊ»uokalani was overthrown by a group of American and European residents with support from the U.S. Minister to Hawaii and U.S. Marines. They established a provisional government, which later became the Republic of Hawaii under President Sanford B. Dole.
Road to U.S. Annexation
Following the overthrow of the monarchy, the provisional government sought annexation to the United States. Initial attempts failed, largely due to opposition from President Grover Cleveland and many Native Hawaiians. However, by 1898, during the Spanish-American War, strategic concerns led the U.S. government to approve annexation through the Newlands Resolution, making Hawaii a U.S. territory.
Hawaiians Who Supported Annexation
Native Hawaiian Supporters
Although most Native Hawaiians opposed annexation, a portion supported it for various reasons. These individuals believed annexation could provide political stability, economic security, and greater opportunities for future generations. Some were also influenced by Christian missionaries and Western education, which shaped their political views.
Influential Hawaiian Figures
There were prominent Native Hawaiian leaders who publicly endorsed annexation:
- John Kaulukou A lawyer and politician who supported integration with the United States to bring modernization and order.
- William PÅ«nohu White Initially a royalist, he later shifted to supporting annexation due to changing political conditions.
- David Kalauokalani Although his position evolved, at one point he viewed annexation as a path to equality under American laws.
These figures often believed that aligning with the United States would better position Hawaiians within a new system they saw as inevitable.
Economic Motivations for Supporting Annexation
Benefits to Sugar Planters and Business Interests
One of the strongest bases of support for annexation came from Hawaiian citizens who were economically tied to the sugar industry. At the time, Hawaii’s economy was heavily dependent on sugar exports, and American tariff laws disadvantaged Hawaiian growers. Annexation promised free trade access to the U.S. market, removing tariffs and boosting profits.
Some Native Hawaiians involved in agriculture or working for American-owned businesses saw annexation as a means to ensure job security and economic growth. They hoped that joining the U.S. would lead to better infrastructure, education, and services.
Desire for Modernization and Investment
Supporters also believed that annexation would attract more U.S. investment in Hawaii’s infrastructure, including transportation, schools, and public health. For Hawaiians invested in modernization and economic development, U.S. annexation offered a promise of progress that local governance could not guarantee alone.
Political Support and Integration
Hawaiian Political Participation
Some Native Hawaiians engaged in the political system established by the Republic of Hawaii and saw annexation as an opportunity to gain influence within a broader American political structure. They hoped that integration would eventually lead to full citizenship and representation in the U.S. government.
They believed that peaceful cooperation could secure rights and equality in the long run, even if annexation meant giving up formal independence. This pragmatic approach was based on adapting to geopolitical realities rather than resisting them entirely.
Role of Mission-Educated Hawaiians
Many Hawaiian elites who had been educated in missionary schools or abroad were more likely to support annexation. They had adopted American values, spoke English fluently, and often held administrative or professional positions. This group saw annexation as aligning with their cultural and educational background, and they believed it could offer upward mobility for Hawaiians willing to assimilate.
Religious and Cultural Influences
Christian Missionary Legacy
Christian missionaries had a profound impact on Hawaiian society since their arrival in the 1820s. Over time, they helped establish schools, churches, and systems of governance based on Western models. Some Native Hawaiians converted to Christianity and embraced these new structures, which made the transition to American governance more acceptable.
For religious converts, annexation was seen as an extension of the moral and cultural transformation they had already begun. They viewed the United States as a Christian nation with values that could help uplift Hawaiian society.
Hopes for Social Reform
Some annexation supporters hoped that U.S. control would bring reforms in education, healthcare, and legal rights. They believed that American governance could help eliminate corruption and inequality within the Republic of Hawaii, leading to a fairer society for all residents, including Native Hawaiians.
Challenges and Controversies
Division Among Hawaiians
It’s important to note that support for annexation was controversial within Hawaiian communities. Many Hawaiians who supported it did so quietly, aware that the majority opposed the loss of sovereignty. These divisions often created tension within families and communities, as debates about identity, loyalty, and future direction intensified.
The Petition Against Annexation
Despite some Hawaiian support for annexation, opposition was widespread. The KÅ«Ê»Ä Petition, signed by over 21,000 Native Hawaiians in 1897, demonstrated massive resistance. Nevertheless, those who supported annexation often argued that resisting U.S. control was futile and that cooperation offered the best path forward.
Long-Term Impact of Support for Annexation
Integration Into the United States
Hawaiians who supported annexation helped facilitate a smoother transition to territorial status. Their cooperation enabled infrastructure development, the expansion of education, and access to U.S. institutions. Hawaii officially became a U.S. territory in 1898 and a state in 1959.
Mixed Legacy Among Native Hawaiians
The legacy of those who supported annexation is still debated today. While some view them as pragmatic realists, others see them as having compromised Hawaiian sovereignty. However, their role in shaping the islands’ future cannot be overlooked. They helped integrate Hawaii into the American political and economic system, which significantly influenced the islands’ development throughout the 20th century.
Complex Motivations and Historical Significance
The story of how Hawaiians supported annexation is one of complexity, contradiction, and personal choice. While the majority opposed the annexation, a minority of Native Hawaiians and local residents believed it offered economic opportunity, political integration, and societal progress. Their support helped shape Hawaii’s modern identity as a multicultural American state. Understanding this history requires recognizing the nuanced motivations behind support, even in the face of a dominant resistance movement. These perspectives offer a fuller picture of Hawaii’s path from an independent kingdom to part of the United States.
#kebawah#