Among the controversial titles in exploitation and horror cinema, Cannibal Holocaust remains one of the most infamous. Released in 1980 by Ruggero Deodato, it ignited widespread debates about censorship, realism, and the boundaries of film. Less known but still discussed among cult film circles is its supposed sequel, often referred to as Cannibal Holocaust 2. This title is somewhat misleading, as the film in question, Natura Contro (also known internationally as The Green Inferno or Cannibal Holocaust II), was directed by Antonio Climati in 1988 and is not a direct continuation of Deodato’s original story. Nonetheless, it carries forward some thematic elements, exploring the jungle horror subgenre in its own unique style, albeit with significant differences in tone and execution.
Clarifying the Sequel Confusion
First and foremost, it’s important to clarify that Cannibal Holocaust 2 is not a traditional sequel. Antonio Climati’s Natura Contro was marketed in some countries as a follow-up to Deodato’s film, likely to capitalize on the original’s notoriety. However, there is no narrative link, returning characters, or continuation of the original plot. Instead, Climati’s film is part of the mondo film tradition, a pseudo-documentary style popularized in the 1960s and ’70s, focusing on shocking real or staged footage from around the world. Climati himself was a veteran of this genre, and Natura Contro bears more resemblance to a mondo-style adventure than a cannibal gorefest.
Plot and Setting
The film follows a group of young researchers and adventurers who embark on an expedition into the Amazon rainforest in search of a missing professor. Along the way, they encounter indigenous tribes, exotic wildlife, and the harsh realities of jungle survival. Unlike Cannibal Holocaust, which emphasized graphic violence and was constructed as found footage, Natura Contro adopts a more conventional narrative structure. It leans more toward adventure drama, with horror elements toned down significantly.
The setting remains one of the strongest elements in Cannibal Holocaust 2. The dense Amazonian jungle is depicted as both awe-inspiring and treacherous, filled with real wildlife and cultural customs. The cinematography is notable for its lush visuals and authentic environmental portrayal, capturing both the beauty and danger of the rainforest.
Differences from the Original
Fans expecting the raw brutality and shock of the original Cannibal Holocaust might be surprised, or even disappointed, by Climati’s approach. There are several key differences that set the two films apart:
- Violence and Gore: Unlike Deodato’s film, which was criticized for its intense gore and animal cruelty, Cannibal Holocaust 2 contains minimal violence. There are no scenes of cannibalism, mutilation, or extreme brutality.
- Ethical Tone: Climati’s film seems more interested in presenting a documentary-style exploration of the jungle, focusing on ecological themes and cultural interactions rather than exploitation.
- Narrative Style: The sequel follows a traditional narrative with scripted dialogue and character arcs, while the original relied on the shock of found footage and ambiguous morality.
These differences suggest that Cannibal Holocaust 2 might appeal to a different type of viewer one more interested in anthropological curiosity than horror spectacle.
Thematic Exploration
While the film does not indulge in graphic horror, it still touches on some of the themes that defined the original. It explores the clash between modern society and indigenous cultures, the environmental impact of human intrusion, and the mystery of unexplored territories. These are presented in a more respectful and observational manner, with less sensationalism.
Interestingly, Cannibal Holocaust 2 reflects a growing awareness of ecological issues during the late 1980s. The film includes moments of commentary on deforestation, the fragility of tribal societies, and the loss of untouched wilderness. These messages are not delivered with subtlety, but they provide a counterbalance to the exploitative reputation of the genre.
Reception and Legacy
Unlike its infamous predecessor, Cannibal Holocaust 2 did not spark international outrage or become a lightning rod for censorship debates. Its more subdued content allowed it to fly under the radar, and as a result, it remains a relatively obscure title even among horror fans. However, its connection to Cannibal Holocaust ensures that it continues to receive attention from genre completists and cult film historians.
Over time, the film has gained a minor following among enthusiasts of Italian exploitation cinema and mondo documentaries. Critics often view it as an interesting but ultimately tame companion piece to the original, lacking the provocative impact but offering a glimpse into a different cinematic approach to similar themes.
Cultural Impact
In recent years, discussions around Cannibal Holocaust 2 have resurfaced due to the rise of internet forums, YouTube retrospectives, and horror fan communities. It has also been rediscovered in the context of ‘eco-horror’ a subgenre that emphasizes environmental themes through the lens of suspense and adventure. While it may not hold the same weight as its predecessor in horror history, it still contributes to the ongoing fascination with jungle-based horror and adventure cinema.
Animal Ethics and Representation
One of the most controversial aspects of Cannibal Holocaust was its treatment of animals. Several real animal deaths were captured on film, leading to widespread condemnation. In contrast, Cannibal Holocaust 2 avoids such depictions. The film does showcase exotic animals in their natural environment, but without scenes of cruelty or harm. This shift reflects a changing attitude toward ethics in filmmaking, especially concerning nature and wildlife.
Moreover, the portrayal of indigenous people is less exploitative. Although the film still falls into some problematic tropes typical of its time, it generally avoids demonizing or dehumanizing tribal cultures. Instead, it attempts though somewhat simplistically to respect their ways of life and highlight their symbiotic relationship with the jungle.
Cannibal Holocaust 2 is a curious artifact in the history of exploitation cinema. Though it lacks the intensity and controversy of its predecessor, it stands on its own as a visually engaging, if uneven, jungle adventure. The misleading title may attract horror fans expecting another descent into depravity, but what they’ll find instead is a slower-paced exploration of nature, culture, and environmental concern. For those interested in the evolution of Italian exploitation cinema, or the legacy of Cannibal Holocaust, Climati’s film offers a gentler yet still intriguing perspective on the themes first introduced in Deodato’s groundbreaking work.